Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

ÀÓÇ÷£Æ® Áö´ëÁÖÀÇ »èÁ¦°úÁ¤ÀÌ °áÇպΠ¾ÈÁ¤¼º¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

The effect of preparation procedure on implant-abutment joint stability

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Ã¶ÇÐȸÁö 2005³â 43±Ç 5È£ p.662 ~ 670
ÀÌÀå¿í, ±èâȸ, Àå°æ¼ö, ÀÓ¿µÁØ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÀÌÀå¿í ( Lee Jang-Wook ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
±èâȸ ( Kim Chang-Whe ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
Àå°æ¼ö ( Jang Kyung-Soo ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç
ÀÓ¿µÁØ ( Lim Young-Jun ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Ã¶Çб³½Ç

Abstract


Statement of problem: Little is known about the effect of abutment preparation procedure on de-torque values in different implant platform and the relationship of final de-torque values with different implant platform size.

Purpose: This study evaluated the effect of abutment preparation procedure on de-torque values in different implant platform and the relationship of final de-torque values with different implant platform size.

Materials & Methods: Six ITI implants (2 narrow-neck implants, 2 regular-neck implants, 2 wide-neck implants) and six Bra.nemark implants (2 narrow platforms, 2 regular platforms, 2 wide platforms) were embedded in each acrylic resin block with epoxy resin. Eighteen synOcta(R) abutments (6 narrow-neck implant-abutments, 6 regular-neck implant-abutments, 6 wide-neck implant-abutments) and eighteen esthetic abutments (6 narrow platform-abutments, 6 regular platform-abutments, 6 wide platform-abutments) were tightened to each implant with digital torque gauge. Initial de-torque values were measured using digital torque gauge. After preparation of abutments, Final de-torque values were measured with digital torque gauge.

Results & Conclusion: 1. Screws loosening or abutments motion were not detected in all experimental group, but some scratches of implant-abutment joints were detected in all group. 2. Reduction ratios of final de-torque values were greater than initial de-torque values in all measured group, except in narrow-neck implant-abutment group (p<0.05). 3. Reduction ratios of final de-torque values in wide-neck implant-abutment group were greater than regular-neck implant-abutment group (p<0.01). 4. The greatest standard deviation value was detected in wide platform group in both implant systems.

Å°¿öµå

Preparable abutment;Initial de-torque value;Final de-torque value;Screw loosening;joint stability

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed